Saturday, March 07, 2009

"ZAP! POW! BAM!" at the Skirball Center: The Verdict !

The photo below shows the artwork at the entrance to the ZAP! POW! BAM! Comic Book Exhibit:


This next photo shows some newspaper headlines from the same Exhibit:


Some Explanatory Text re the Heralded "Golden Age" of Comics:


A close-up of some very creative display dividers at said Exhibit:


The undersigned shadowed by the Dick Tracy Exhibit at the Skirball's companion exhibit featuring Superheroes in Film:


The Verdict: "WOW!... ZAP! BAM! POW! Go See This Show NOW!"

Updated, Sat., March 7, 2009

So there I was listening to Jerry Robinson, the creator of THE JOKER (as in the Batman comic book series) chat with Mark Evanier the other nite, Thursday, March 6th, at the Skirball Cultural Center in Los Angeles.... and in response to a question from the audience, Jerry says that in deciding on the Joker as the protagonist-villain as counterpoint to Batman, that "Names are so Important in Comics"! Well, that is Divine Reassurance for any trademark attorney, to be sure. Comic book character names are so important in comics. And the guy who created THE JOKER said it ! Helloooooo ! Thank you !

And that is EXACTLY why registering your character names as trademarks is so important, if possible ! I rest my case.


(Source: Skirball.org)


(Source: Skirball.org)


Dateline: Feb. 19, 2009 through August 9, 2009.

Venue: Skirball Cultural Center, Los Angeles, Calif.

What: "ZAP! POW! BAM! The Superhero: The Golden Age of Comic Books, 1938 - 1950"


(Source: Skirball.org)

Web Link: http://www.skirball.org/index.php?option=com_ccevents&scope=exbt&task=detail&oid=34&ccmenu=v2hhdcdzie9u

Among the Super Heroes featured are Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman in this exhibit which "showcases work by the Jewish artists and writers who created heroic comic book characters during the late 1930s and '40s." (Westways Magazine, March/April 2009, page 52).


(Source: Skirball.org)

Additionally, there is a companion exhibit produced by the Skirball Center itself called, "It's A Bird, It's A Plane, It's Superheroes of Film and Television!, curated by Ms. Erin Clancey (Palisadian-Post, Feb. 26, 2009, page 11).
http://www.palisadespost.com/content/index.cfm?Story_ID=4679

Per the Skirball Center's website, "Lights, Camera, Action examines the close relationship and parallel development of the comic book and motion picture industries. Objects on view include the original 1966 Batcycle from the Batman television series on loan from the Petersen Automotive Museum, along with vintage movie posters on loan from the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, original comic books on loan from the University of California, Riverside, and movie and television memorabilia."


(Pictured above: Batcycle • Collection of Margie and Robert E. Petersen)

This exhibit is said to include vintage posters and movie costumes from such films as the 1978 Superman movie starring Christopher Reeve, as well as Michael Keaton's Batman costume. No additional admission fee is charged for this exhibit. More bang for your buck! Tickets are $10 for adults, $7 for seniors and students, and $5 for children 2 - 12. For more information, call 310.440.4564 or on check it out on the web at www.skirball.org

Finally, for the comic book afficionado, you may want to calendar attending the chat session at the Skirball on Thursday, March 5th at 8 pm when Golden Age Artist Jerry Robinson will discuss "The Golden Age of Comic Books". This should be a real treat because Robinson is credited with creating Batman's most famous adversary, The Joker, as well as naming Batman's protege, Robin the Boy Wonder.

If you are not yet enticed to see this exhibit, check out the following copy of Jerry Robinson's original sketch from 1940 of The Joker. Note the red shading of the Joker's lips to illustrate the character's makeup.


(Source: Palisadespost.com; From the Collection of Jerry Robinson).

Zap! Bam! Pow!... and get yourself to this show !

And don't forget that "Superheroes Need Protection Too!" http://www.trademarkesq.com/pages/article2.html

For that, TrademarkEsq is here for you !

**********************************************

Monday, March 02, 2009

WHY I LOVE CHICAGO !


(Painting & Source: "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte" by Georges Seurat;
http://www.artic.edu/artaccess/AA_Impressionist/pages/IMP_7.shtml)
*** The original painting is on display as part of the permanent collection at the Art Institute of Chicago ***

Let me name the reasons:

•The Fugitive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fugitive_(1993_film)
•The Blue Brothers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blues_Brothers_(film)

•Second City
http://www.secondcity.com
•Navy Pier
http://www.navypier.com/visit_us/directions.html
•Chicago Blues
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_blues
•Muddy Waters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muddy_Waters
•Buddy Guy's Legends
http://buddyguys.com

•Billy Goat Tavern
http://www.billygoattavern.com


•Lake Michigan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Michigan
•The University of Chicago
http://www.uchicago.edu

•Museum of Science and Industry
http://www.msichicago.org


•Deep Dish Pizza

http://chicago.citysearch.com/bestof/winners/pizza

•Ed Debevic's (the original)
http://www.eddebevics.com

•Carson's Ribs
http://www.ribs.com
•Scoozi !
http://www.leye.com/restaurants/directory/scoozi
•Taylor Street
http://www.ristorante.net/taylor.htm
•Tufano's Vernon Park Tap
http://www.yelp.com/biz/tufanos-vernon-park-tap-chicago
*** note: Call in advance to see if they will be serving the "Eggplant Parmesan"... it is to die for ! Trust me !
•Spinach Pizza at Bacino's http://www.bacinos.com/

•Rush Street
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Street_(Chicago)
•Oak St. Beach
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak_Street_Beach
•Grant Park
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_Park_(Chicago)

... and besides my nephew's name is Grant !

Soldier Field, e.g., "Da Bears !"...


•Stunning Architecture
http://architecture.about.com/od/usa/p/chicago.htm






•The Art Institute of Chicago
http://www.artic.edu

*** including the World Famous and Utterly Remarkable Postimpressionist Painting by Georges Seurat, namely, "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte" http://www.artic.edu/artaccess/AA_Impressionist/pages/IMP_7.shtml

•Sculpture


(An Untitled Sculpture by Pablo Picasso)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Picasso

•The Chagall Wall
http://www.worldofstock.com/closeups/AAB1217.php

•The Shedd Aquarium


•Will Maguire with "Man With Fish"


(Photo by Gary Borquez, Esq., CEO, Wheelhouse Legal Search,
Photo taken in May, 2007 during Annual Meeting of Intl. Trademark Assn.)

•The Standard Club
http://www.stclub.org
•Printer's Row
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer%27s_Row,_Chicago

•The Cubs and Wrigley Field
http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com

•The Bulls Run of 1990-91 to the NBA Championship
•The Last Season at Comiskey Park, Summer 1990:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comiskey_Park

•Michigan Avenue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Avenue_(Chicago)
•Marshall Field's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Field's
•The Sears Tower
http://www.searstower.com

and, of course, my alma mater, The John Marshall Law School, where I earned my LL.M (Masters of Law) degree in Intellectual Property in June of 1991. http://www.jmls.edu

If you've never been to Chicago, GO !


***** ***** ***** ***** *****

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Hollywood in Winter !


(Photo by and Copyright Nick Steers 2009. All Rights Reserved. Used here with permission. Reproduction without consent is strictly prohibited).

Wow ! Not much you can say about this photo ! After four days of winter storms, with snow levels approaching 2,000 feet, this was the view from the westside yesterday afternoon, 02.09.09.

Photo details:
Camera: Olympus E-500 with a telephoto lens.
Time of day: Taken about 3pm, Monday, Feb. 9, 2009.
Location: At the corner of Centinela and Ocean Park Blvd,
in Santa Monica, Calif.
View: Northeast of Santa Monica, Century City in middle, Hollywood Sign
in background followed by San Gabriel Mountains.

Many thanks to Photographer, Nick Steers, for sharing this amazing photograph with us !

Enjoy !

Thursday, February 05, 2009

JURY SERVICE 101


(Photo of the new LAX Adjacent Superior Court of California, in El Segundo, Calif. Photo by Will Maguire. Used here with permission.)

The undersigned was recently called for jury service and so we thought we would write up a little bit about this civic service experience.

JURY SERVICE 101: From Selection to Peremptory Challenge

Dec. 25, 2008. Merry Christmas morning. I collect my mail and there it is, that envelope I've seen several times before in years past from the Superior Court of Calif, Office of the Jury Commissioner. Inside, the invitation to appear for Jury Service beginning Monday, February 2, 2009 through Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009.

January 31st and Feb. 1, 2009. The first two days I call in the nite before as instructed and am told not to appear.

Feb. 3, 2009. I call the 800 number after 6 pm as I have done the previous two evenings and lo and behold I hear a different message that tells me to be at the Courthouse the following morning at 8 a.m. !

Feb. 4, 2009. I spend the entire day at the courthouse. Attendance is confirmed. A video is screened. A lecture and introduction is given. The first of two groups are called for for jury service and sent off to courtrooms. Around 11:15 a.m, I am called to a courtroom for what we learn to be an anticipated 10 day trial minimum. Fortunately, there are enough potential jurors who stand up as being able to participate for several weeks, so that the two dozen of us who stayed seated because of problems with serving for that long of a period are as a group summarily released by the judge and told to return to 4th floor jury room for possible further selection. Then comes lunch from 12 noon to 1:30 pm. Upon my return from lunch, my number is called and I am instructed to proceed to a trial on the 7th floor where I am selected for a 2 - 3 day trial. The rest of the afternoon the Judge and counsel attempt to select a jury. We are dismissed around 4:30 pm for the day and told to return to the courtroom at 10:30 am the next day.


(View from the 7th Floor of the Courthouse, looking east toward Downtown L.A. Note: The American Airlines jet on approach to LAX. Photo by Will Maguire. Used here with permission).

Feb. 5, 2009, 10:30 a.m. Back on the Seventh Floor, Courtroom A. Our jury is again seated and voir dire (questions by the Judge and Counsel) continues. The final jury has not yet been selected but just shy of 12 noon we do finally get there and then come the "peremptory challenges" allowed for both the prosecution and the defense (see below). As luck or fate would have it, the defense selected me for peremptory challenge and I was free to depart after checking in with the 4th Floor Jury Room staff and was thus finished with my jury service.

Peremptory Challenge, defined:

"From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peremptory_challenge

Peremptory challenge usually refers to a right in jury selection for the defense and prosecution to reject a certain number of potential jurors who appear to have an unfavorable bias without having to give any reason. Other potential jurors may be challenged for cause, i.e. by giving a reason why they might be unable to reach a fair verdict.

The idea behind peremptory challenges is that if both parties have contributed in the configuration of the jury, they will find its verdict more acceptable. The existence of peremptory challenges are an important safeguard in the judicial process as it allows both the defendant and the prosecution to get rid of potentially biased jurors. Their use allows attorneys to use their training and experience to dismiss jurors who might say the correct thing, but might otherwise harbor prejudices that could infringe the rights of the defendant to a fair trial.

The use of peremptory challenges is controversial as some feel it has been used to undermine the balanced representation on a jury which would occur using random selection. Despite this, it still remains in use in several jurisdictions and in some cases leads to extensive and expensive jury research, aimed at producing a favorable jury."

Comment: I do not know for sure why I was challenged and removed from the jury being impaneled but I was relieved since I anticipate that this trial will run into tuesday including deliberations, which would be an imposition upon my clients and potentially harm my zealous representation of my client matters.

It was nevertheless an interesting experience. There were definitely a few people who were doing everything they could to get out of it, in my opinion. There were 4 lawyers on the jury panel before the challenges and three of us were removed via peremptory challenges. So call it a hunch that neither side wanted any lawyers on the jury.

Civic duty concluded, I turned in my juror badge and was given a juror receipt for having completed my jury service...... and away I drove into the rain just starting to beat down on the mean streets of Los Angeles...

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Is Chocolate Recession-Proof !?


(Source: Google Images and marketplace.issi.net. HERSHEY'S is a registered trademark of the Trademark Holder and is used here strictly as a fair use for academic and scholarship purposes).


According to the WSJ, 01.28.09, "Hershey Co's fourth-quarter profit and sales growth suggests that demand for chocolate remains strong despite the dismal economy." I could have told them that from my own personal experience, granted.....but this is Great News for Trademark Owners of Chocolate Brands and Trademarks. The undersigned's preference for Dark Chocolate, notwithstanding, consider: HERSHEYS, M&M's, SEE's, FANNIE MAY and even grocery store chain, Trader Joe's, has got its own private lable chocolate. CAVEAT: this short blog post will kindly and respectfully not torture the reader by discussing such European Chocolates like Nestle, Lindt and Cadbury.

On the other hand, premium chocolate brands, e.g., the so-called designer chocolates, may be taking a hit, with consumers apparently trading down according to the WSJ in its article dated Jan. 28, 2009 at which can be seen at the following link:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123306391902119401.html


Everyday CHOCOLATE, however, is apparently the Elvis of of sweets. So HERSHEYS and the like are reaping the rewards of cost-conscious chocolate consumers (hereinafter, CCCC).

In any event, this being a trademark blog, for those of you interested in all things chocolate should know that Chocolate is registrable in International Class #30. An example of a U.S. Federal Trademark Registration for chocolate includes:

Word Mark: HERSHEY'S

Goods and Services, IC 030. US 046. G & S: CHOCOLATE, COCOA, SWEET CHOCOLATE, MILK CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATE COATINGS, CHOCOLATE LIQUORS, AND CHOCOLATE POWDER. FIRST USE: 18940101. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 18940101

Serial Number 71016827
Filing Date February 8, 1906
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1A
Published for Opposition April 24, 1906
Registration Number 0054041
Registration Date June 19, 1906

This is a remarkable registration. Registered in 1906 with first use since 1894! Hallelujah! Hershey's is clearly the Holy Grail of American Chocolate. That's for sure ! http://www.hersheys.com/chocolateworld/

And with that, it's time to "Exit, Stage Left" to Trader Joe's...

editor's note: After 4 oz of Trader Joe's Dark Chocolate you will be saying to yourself, "Recession, What Recession ?!"

*******************************************

Monday, January 26, 2009

TrademarkEsq Is Here For You !

If you live on the westside of Los Angeles, chances are our office is close by. Our W.L.A. office is located at 11500 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90064-1525. We are located in the City National Bank building at the corner of Olympic and Colby, approx. 4 blocks west of the 405 Fwy.

During our lunch break today, I captured the following two shots with my digital camera three blocks west of our office at Barrington, as well as at the corner of Colby and Olympic.

"Olympic and Barrington"


"Olympic and Colby"


Please remember:

TrademarkEsq is here for you !


Trademark • Copyright • Licensing

Will Maguire
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM E. MAGUIRE
http://www.TrademarkEsq.com
email: maguire@artnet.net

Sunday, January 25, 2009

"Gran Torino" Script is a Classic !

While it was not easy to track down the script for this most recent Clint Eastwood starring film, here is the link for your convenience.

http://www.joblo.com/Gran%20Torino.htm

I recommend Pages 82 - 89 for the banter at the Barbershop with Walt (Eastwood), the Barber and Tao (the kid).

The link to said script is provided as a courtesy only. Rights to reproduce said script must be obtained from the proprietary rights holders. "Gran Torino" Copyright 2008 Warner Bros. Ent. All Rights Reserved. Screenplay by Nick Schenk.

Enjoy !

***** ***** ***** ***** *****

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

The USPTO Brush-back

Happy New Year to our subscribers and to our visitors !

TrademarkEsq received some good news today via email from the folks at the online dictionary, Urban Dictionary, www.UrbanDictionary.com, as follows:

From: info@urbandictionary.com
Subject: Urban Dictionary - Brush-back was published
Date: January 21, 2009 2:22:47 PM PST
To: tmesq@yahoo.com

"Thanks for your definition of Brush-back!

Editors reviewed your entry and have decided to publish it on urbandictionary.com.

It should appear on this page in the next few days:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define/php?term=Brush-back

Urban Dictionary

-----

Brush-back

To refute, reject, deny or disagree with a position or argument made by another to advance their agenda. Cross-reference, brushback, e.g., the brushback pitch in baseball to reclaim the corners of the strike zone from an encroaching batter.

The position advanced by the Applicant was refuted and rejected by the Examiner citing typical brush-back "Laudatory" denial language as set forth in the statute and case law."

Readers may recall our earlier blog post dated Oct. 8, 2008 entitled:

USPTO Trademark Practice: The USPTO Brush-back

http://trademarkesq.blogspot.com/2008/10/uspto-trademark-practice-uspto-brush.html


We invite you to visit or revisit this article from this past October, 2008, esp. now that the referenced term of art, "Brush-back", has received web cred !

TrademarkEsq is here for you !

****************************************************

Thursday, January 08, 2009

L.A. Burger Wars 2009: R+D vs. LITERATI II

The Kobe Chedder Cheeseburger at R+D KITCHEN, Santa Monica, Calif., January 8, 2009 (photo by Will Maguire. Low light/no flash).


The R+D KITCHEN Carrot Cake (low light/no flash)


The Kobe Chedder Cheeseburger at LITERATII II, in West L.A. (photo by Will Maguire. Natural light).


The LITERATI II Carrot Cake, aka The Big Kahuna of Carrot Cakes. Hands down the clear winner. Trust me.

January 2009

Although the clandestine photos of the cheeseburger and carrot cake at R+D KITCHEN in Santa Monica were taken in low light with no flash, the undersigned can assure the reader that the burger was quite tasty and the carrot cake quite moist and delicious.

The photo comparisons above of said R+D specimens vs. the infamous Kobe Chedder Cheeseburger at West L.A.'s LITERATI II, as well as its Carrot Cake, leave no doubt that the battle of the burgers continues into the year 2009.

The burger at R+D is worthy of a center spread in Bon Appetit'. The presentation is simply gorgeous. The burger at LITERATI II, is larger but does not share the same presentation skills. The LITERATI II burger, however, is a monster and very tasty.

One thing is certain, however, the service at R+D KITCHEN is "Exceptional"! It is Outstanding ! From the hosts to the waiters, the staff is friendly, professional and polite. And it's not a put on either. After three plus visits to this establishment, the exceptional service has not wavered. This, of course, is the reason I keep going to this restaurant. The people there are just nice. Check out their website at: http://www.hillstone.com/#/restaurants/cafeRandD/

LITERATI II does not have the same level of service. It is good service. The staff is professional and meals are served properly and timely, but the people skills that are so exceptional at R+D do not shine as bright at LITERATI II.

The Carrot Cake is BETTER at LITERATI II, however. No Question ! LITERATI II takes the cake on this count ! Check out their website at: http://www.literati2.com/

You will just have to try these two restaurants to choose which you like better. And just to really shake things up, you may want to try the Kobe Cheeseburger at nearby Santa Monica based "Rustic Canyon" on Wilshire just east of 11th St (http://www.rusticcanyonwinebar.com/). This burger is a bit smaller than at LITERATI II but it does come with fries which are very fresh and tasty. The fries are extra at R+D and they cost $5 bucks for not a lot of fries. So R+D gets demerits for short changing its customers on its shoestrings. If you are into wine, then Rustic Canyon and R+D have extensive and exclusive offerings. If your thing is coffee, check out the very elegant coffee service at Rustic Canyon where you get your very own several cup big stainless steel carafe of freshly brewed coffee with all the accoutrements. Very civilized. Trust me on this ! You will be delighted.

What does all this have to do with Trademarks ? Each of these three referenced restaurants have established common law trademark rights in the names of their establishments in the form of service marks. The undersigned has helped several Los Angeles area restaurants maximize their rights by obtaining Federal Service mark registrations for 'restaurant services'. This entitles the owner to exclusivity under most circumstances. The last thing a restaurant needs is a competitor stealing customers by advertising and promoting itself with the same or similar name.

For more information on this topic of restaurant trademark protection, please see our earlier blog post of Nov. 10, 2008, which can be observed by clicking on this link and scrolling down to Section II therein http://trademarkesq.blogspot.com/2008/10/hollywood-eateries-past-and-present.html

Bon Appetit',

TrademarkEsq
is here for you !

*********************************************************


Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Happy New Year !


TrademarkEsq and the Law Offices of William E. Maguire wish you and yours a very Happy New Year !

May the new year bring you peace and prosperity and a bright future and outlook for us all.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

*** Happy Holidays from TrademarkEsq ***

"Merry Merry Red Coffee Cherries"

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to one and all.

Ripe Red 100 Percent Kona Coffee Cherries just picked from the tree.
November, 2008 Honaunau, Hawaii

Photo by Will Maguire. Copyright 2008 Will Maguire. All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

The Greatest Thing Since the Stanford Marching Band...

Dateline: Dec. 8, 2008

As per the Los Angeles Daily Journal,

By Craig Anderson
Daily Journal Staff Writer

SAN JOSE - "Stanford Law School will unveil a first-of-its-kind online database today that tracks every patent lawsuit filed in the United States since 2000 and gives academic researchers and attorneys unprecedented access to information about litigation.

Mark Lemley, who spearheaded the creation of the Stanford Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse, said he hopes the database provides "systematic information" that can assist attorneys in handling pending cases and policymakers in deciding how to change patent laws..... There are more than 50,000 other cases -- including trademark, copyright, antitrust and trade secrets theft claims -- in the database..."

The website and link to this Clearinghouse is as follows:

http://lexmachina.stanford.edu


----- ------ ------ ----- -----

Thursday, December 04, 2008

KONA COFFEE TRADEMARKS 101



"KONA COFFEE TRADEMARKS 101:
Selection, Clearance & Registration"

*by William E. Maguire, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM E. MAGUIRE
Los Angeles, California

INTRODUCTION

Anyone visiting Kailua-Kona on the Big Island of Hawaii would be pleasantly surprised by the number of coffee industry trademarks on display, e.g., KONA JOE®, HAWAIIAN KONA CAFFE®, ROYAL KONA®, MAUNA LOA®, HULA DADDY KONA COFFEE®, just to name a few. This is especially true during the annual Kona Coffee Cultural Festival. With respect to such Java trademarks and service marks, this article will briefly introduce the readers to the fundamental aspects of trademark law.







TRADEMARKS DEFINED

A trademark (or mark) is defined as any word, symbol, slogan, or device (such as a design), or a combination of them, used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify his goods or services and to distinguish them from those manufactured, sold or serviced by others. HAWAIIAN KONA CAFFE® and KONA JOE® are excellent examples of 'word' marks. An example of a slogan mark is FROM FARM TO CUP® for coffee. In the village of Kailua-Kona, an example of a coffee-related service mark is ISLAND LAVA JAVA™ for retail store and restaurant services featuring coffee. Other coffee related service marks include KONA JOE® for both food vending services and restaurant services. Thus, the example of KONA JOE® illustrates that the same mark can function as both a trademark and service mark. Service marks are used typically through advertising and promotion, whereas trademarks are used on labels typically in connection with goods.

In the U.S., trademark rights are acquired through use (e.g., by selling or transporting your product in commerce with the mark attached or on a label). In addition, under certain circumstances "color" can be a trademark. Examples outside the coffee industry are the color "pink" for fiberglass insulation and "green" for dry cleaning pads. With respect to the coffee industry, this writer is unaware of any company taking advantage of this opportunity to use color as a trademark.

SELECTION AND CLEARANCE

The selection of a trademark is the first step that a merchant undertakes to create an identity for his/her brand of coffee and related merchandise, e.g., apparel, ceramic mugs, etc. The clearance of a trademark is the process of determining whether or not the trademark is available and is not being used by someone else as a trademark. This clearance process cannot be overemphasized in its importance. Ignoring this vital step can lead to a multitude of problems and expense. In the clearance of a trademark, a two-step process is suggested. The first step is to conduct an on-line internet trademark search of the mark. This on-line search is further clarified by identifying the goods sought to be used or sold as trademarks are categorized by classification. In the United States, the federal government has adopted the International Classification system. Coffee and tea are in Class #30. Toys, sporting goods, swim fins and surfboards are in Class #28. T-shirts and related apparel and clothing are in Class #25. Ceramic mugs and beverage ware are in Class #21. Gear bags, backpacks, fanny packs, etc. are in Class #18. Posters, magazines, books, trading cards, and other printed matter and publications are in Class #16, e.g., Coffee Times™. Videotapes, audiotapes, dvd's, cd's and business software are in Class #9. Therefore, if you are planning to sell coffee, t-shirts and ceramic mugs, then you will want to conduct an on-line search of Classes # 30, 25 and 21. The registered trademark, KONA JOE®, is a good example of a trademark registered for coffee mugs, shirts, t-shirts, as well as coffee and coffee beans. And MAUNA LOA® is a registered trademark in Class #30 for such goods as "brownies, coffee, cookies, cake, candy, chocolate covered macadamia nuts, etc".






The on-line search is often called a "knock-out" search. This is because the on-line search is a quick and relatively inexpensive way to determine if the mark is already being used. These on-line searches are often available at public libraries, commercial search firms, via the internet, and law firms. If your mark appears free of conflicts after conducting an on-line search, the next level of search is the Full Search, which is obtained from commercial search firms. The Full Search will search the Federal database of trademarks at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), State trademark registrations, and common law sources such as phone directories, domain name registrations, and Dun & Bradstreet listings. If your mark still appears clear of conflicts after a full search, then you can be fairly certain that you can adopt and start using your mark. CAVEAT: These searches are not guarantees of the absence of conflicting marks, but they do allow a merchant to make a more informed decision in the clearance of a trademark. Also, if you are planning on having an internet domain name registered incorporating your trademark, then you will be well advised to do so just as soon as possible. In addition, it is also advised that you first check to make sure that the domain name that you want to use is available. Checking on the availability of a domain name is today certainly a common and simple task that can be performed on the world wide web.

FEDERAL TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

To obtain maximum protection, it is best to register your trademark or service mark. In the U.S., your greatest rights can be obtained with a federal trademark registration. If you are only conducting business within one state, e.g., Hawaii, it is possible to register your mark with the Dept. of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Business Registration Division, in Honolulu (x-ref: http://hawaii.gov/dcca/areas/breg/ ). California, as well as other states, have similar opportunities for the registration of trademarks on a state level. However, if it is your intent to do business across state lines or in foreign commerce (or if you are already doing business across state lines or in foreign commerce), then the prudent thing to do is to file for a federal trademark application with the USPTO located in Alexandria, Virginia. Applications can now be submitted on-line via the internet at http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm. This task is not necessarily a simple one in spite of the USPTO's preference for on-line filing and one must concentrate and exercise prudence, patience and skill in completing this process. An experienced trademark lawyer will likely benefit the Applicant's opportunity for successful registration.

An application for registration of a trademark must be filed in the name of the owner of the mark. The applicant must submit: (a) an application; (b) a drawing of the mark; (c) the required filing fee (which is approximately $325 per mark per class at this time). The applicant will also incur attorneys fees, typically a fixed fee, should an attorney be hired to file the application(s). As previously discussed, trademarks registered with the Federal Government are categorized by a classification system which correspond to the type of goods sought to be registered.

After the mark is registered in the U.S., it is important to give notice of this fact by placing the registered trademark symbol, "®", adjacent to the mark. Prior to registration, it is also advisable to use the symbols, "TM" (for trademarks) and "SM" (for service marks).

The chief advantages of a federal registration include:

1. "Constructive Notice" nationwide of the registrant's claim to ownership of the mark. This basically eliminates the good faith defense of an infringer who claims to have lacked actual knowledge of the registered mark.

2. Registration is also evidence of (a) the validity of the registration; (b) the registrant's ownership of the mark; and (c) the registrant's exclusive right to use the mark in commerce in connection with the goods or services.

3. Registration also entitles the registrant to (a) file a lawsuit for infringement of the mark in Federal Court; (b) prevent importation of goods bearing an infringing mark; and (c) use the registration as a basis for registering the same mark in certain foreign countries.

Trademark registrations are valid for 10 years subject to certain use and filing requirements, and are renewable every 10 years, also subject to continued use and renewal filing requirements.

FOREIGN TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

If your product is distributed internationally, then you must, by and large, register your mark(s) in each country where you plan to do business or are doing business. Is this expensive? Yes! On the other hand, the alternative is the potential loss of the ability to sell your product in those countries where a third party has filed a prior application for your mark(s). Therefore, foreign trademark protection is typically obtained on a country-by-country basis. Unlike the U.S., however, trademark rights in many foreign countries are obtained by registration rather than use. This further necessitates the importance of filing for marks in foreign countries as soon as possible.

One notable alternative to the typical practice of registering trademarks on a country-by-country basis is the European Community Trade Mark Application (x-ref: www.oami.europa.eu ) which has been available since January 1, 1996 for the filing of applications. By obtaining a Community wide trademark registration, an owner of a U.S. registered trademark, for example, can potentially save both time and money otherwise invested in registering a mark in each separate European country and can thus hopefully attain maximum protection for its trademarks in overseas markets at a minimum of cost. An additional and separate registration option is that offered by the Madrid Protocol, an international treaty that the United States belongs to and enforces. The details of this treaty, however, are beyond the scope of this article (x-ref: http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/registration/madrid_protocol/ ).

CONCLUSION

Whether you are selling products or services, it is very important to be aware of your trademark and/or service mark and their value. In a competitive business environment, the potential for economic loss is tremendous if trademark rights are not acquired, evaluated, protected and maximized. While this article does not portend to cover all the intricacies of trademark law, hopefully it has helped to shed some light on this area of the law which is of paramount importance to the business owner.



*William E. Maguire has been a member of the California bar since 1981, has an LL.M degree in Intellectual Property, and was previously Senior Counsel for Malibu Comics Entertainment, Inc., a subsidiary of Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. He has also served as outside trademark, copyright and licensing counsel for The Baywatch Production Company. He is currently in private practice in West Los Angeles where he concentrates on trademark, copyright and licensing matters, and represents clients in the entertainment, publishing, interactive, toy, sporting goods, restaurant, coffee, cigar and apparel industries.

--
William E. Maguire, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM E. MAGUIRE
11500 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1525
Phone 310.470.2929 and 312.4525
Fax 310.474.4710 and 312.4560
Email: maguire@artnet.net
Web: http://www.TrademarkEsq.com
Blog: http://TrademarkEsq.blogspot.com

Trademark * Copyright * Licensing

Monday, December 01, 2008

WICKED Is !

The World Famous Hollywood Sign



Wicked
http://www.pantagestheatertickets.com/wicked-pantages-theater.htm




Wicked Merchandise



Dateline: Sunday, Nov. 30, 2008, Pantage's Theater, Hollywood, Calif.

If you have not yet seen WICKED on stage at the Pantage's, then stop everything and get your tickets now because the show will be closing very, very soon !

In case you have been in a cave or only read spy novels and watch westerns on saturday mornings on broadcast television, then you have not heard about the Broadway Musical, WICKED, now in it final run at the Pantage's. (x-ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_(musical)

Wicked
http://www.pantagestheatertickets.com/wicked-pantages-theater.htm
.

And for those of you looking for a bit of continuing legal education regarding this property, here are a few tidbits:

WICKED, the musical stage production, is based on the novel by Gregory Maguire (no relation to the undersigned, at least I think not; x-ref: http://www.gregorymaguire.com/books/wicked.html), which itself is based on the public domain novel, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, by L. Frank Baum (x-ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz).



*** And don't forget the I.P. ! Intellectual Property. Cross-Reference: WICKED Merchandise (see photo above). There are a handful of WICKED trademarks and service marks which are owned by a Universal Pictures related entity, namely, Wicked LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 100 Universal City Plaza, Universal City CALIFORNIA 91608. Among the U.S. Federal Trademark and Service mark Registrations for WICKED are the following:

- Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going theatrical production, in International Class #41.
- Fanny packs and all purpose bags, in Class #18.
- Plush toys and sporting goods, namely, golf balls, in Class #28.
- Cups and mugs, in Class #21.
- Downloadable ringtones, graphics and music via a global computer network, mobile phones, or wireless devices; pre-recorded compact discs featuring music, in Class #9.

Note: Each of these registrations are in composite format, e.g., inclusive of a design element, which is often identified as follows: "WICKED (and design)". In this particular case, the design is represented by a stylized font and a caricature of a witch in the place of the dot in the letter "i" (see below).



It is, of course, these trademarks and service mark registrations which protect the licensees for their investment in acquiring the licenses for all the WICKED swag, e.g., merchandise (note: the t-shirts, hoodies, cups, mugs, jewelry, cd's, etc.) as shown in the photo above entitled, "WICKED Merchandise".